You see, even though LOFAR is split into many stations, not all LOFAR stations are the same. In the Netherlands — the centre of the LOFAR network — where the stations are close together, there are more of them, but they are smaller.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89c6e/89c6e4e8fb648e4e5dff679d6fada96759a2279c" alt=""
there are two small patches of HBA tiles. The 'shotgun pattern' of
antennas in between them is the LBA. (Photo: LOFAR Gallery)
As you move out from the centre of the network, the stations get bigger and their configurations change. This is for a number of reasons to do with performance, cost and ease of deployment. In this article, we'll only consider the HBA in the station, as this is where the changes are the most striking and where the most pronounced difference between LOFAR and KAIRA will be realised.
Essentially, there are three types of standard LOFAR station:
- Core stations = 2 × 24 HBA tiles
- Remote stations = 48 HBA tiles
- International stations = 96 HBA tiles
This is what these configurations look like (note you can click on any of the weblog images to see larger versions):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52266/52266dc87ac70b685f8bf18d8d7325c42fa0113a" alt=""
So that's the description of the LOFAR station HBA layouts. But what of KAIRA?
Despite having the same hardware, KAIRA is quite different and with some distinctive features, dictated by its multi-purpose applications, challenging build site and some interesting future plans.
But we'll discuss that in tomorrow's web log post!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.